My point is people make poor judgments, bad to awful decisions every day. So is 55 Million the bench mark for something that would be considered even with this then from there we could speculate something 1/2 as bad would get 25 mil and something worse could get 100 mil. I'm sure we have all been wronged or treated poorly at some level and probably all know someone that had something done to them that might in our minds be considered something close to what happened to Andrews. So if we use 55 Million and what was done to her as the baseline for damages then How much are other things worth? I'm not arguing that she was wronged and that the person that did it is a dirt/scumbag and the hotel used terrible judgment. I'm just saying that if our legal system thinks that she was wronged at 55 million then that sets the bar quite a bit higher then what I would think is reasonable. Insurance pays all/most of what she will collect and we all pay the insurance.