I understand criticizing the coach, criticizing the gameplan, criticizing recruiting strategies, all that kind of stuff. But the whole "Buzz should tell them X"...I mean, what do any of us know? Buzz probably IS telling them this kind of stuff. There's a ton of room for discussion, but between the "I know you are but what am I?" and the "Buzz should do things this way" it all just kind of comes off like the petulant child method of forum response writing.

There's a big difference between bringing up points about the team and things that could be done to improve things and trying to put words in the mouth of the coach when everything that's going on is behind closed doors and none of us know if those words weren't said.

I don't know...maybe this is my own form of whining, but to me, there are ways to criticize that work and ways that don't. Posts like that simply don't work for me.

It's like Ners on Scoop...there's this big push for Dawson to get 40 minutes based on what he might do. No one actually knows what he can do except Buzz, but he might be better than Derrick, so let's write 400 posts about how Magic Dawson should be starting and we'd be so much better. Except no one has actually seen Dawson against high major competition. Surmising about something you have absolutely zero idea about (such as what Dawson would do against HM competition or what Buzz should be saying in private to his players) just doesn't make sense to me. Now saying you'd like to see Dawson get a chance, or saying Buzz needs to figure out what buttons to push, I guess that would make more sense to me, but acting as though you know what's happening in closed-door practices and meetings and suggesting how it should be done better when the simple truth is you have no idea...

I don't know...just my rant for today, I guess. On to bigger and better things today, like me and Mrs. brew going to buy a new house. Just went and picked up some nice engraved pens for the signing.