Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Goodman on Creighton

  1. #1

    Goodman on Creighton

    Jeff Goodman ‏@GoodmanESPN · 3h3 hours ago
    Told by a little birdie Creighton had its way w/ Missouri this past weekend in secret scrimmage. Two transfers — Watson and Huff- were good

  2. #2
    Creighton will be sneaky good this season. Their non-conference schedule is the direct opposite of ours, with few dogs but only two strong games (at Indiana and at Oklahoma) and a trap game (at a Loyola-Chicago team that probably falls between 50 and 100 nationally). While our schedule has a bunch of dogs, we also have a bunch of opportunities to rack up decent wins (the only game we may be more then a one-possession underdog is Wisconsin, and I could see Henry and Luke obliterating the Badgers down low). Creighton may be that team with a weak resume but strong power numbers that is contentiously debated on Selection Sunday.
    #BringShakaHome

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Apparently Happ is the real deal from what I have have heard. I think UW will be fine up front.

  5. #5
    I can't believe Missouri has fallen so much in basketball and now playing in a weaker SEC compared to the Big 12 days.
    Still good to hear good things about Creighton.
    March Madness starts in November

  6. #6
    Huff and Watson may be the two best transfers into the league this year. I think Watson is probably better than Lewis at Butler, and I'd take Huff over Johnson at SJU any day. Creighton is gong to be tougher this year than many anticipate. I think our primary battle for fifth is with Creighton, not Providence.
    Last edited by Phantom Warrior; 10-28-2015 at 12:22 AM.

  7. #7
    Tyler Lewis might have something to say about that.

  8. #8
    I meant Lewis when I wrote Smith (since corrected). If I had a choice between Lewis and Watson, I think I'd go with Watson.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •