Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Bucks trade for Greivis Vasquez

  1. #1

    Bucks trade for Greivis Vasquez

    Bucks trade this year's 2nd rd pick and next year's 1st rd pick for Toronto PG Greivis Vasquez

  2. #2
    Shocked that Dekker is still on board, as bad as Bucks need a center & SG, do they take him if he's there?

  3. #3
    This was a great trade...










    ...For Toronto. Don't see how he is an improvement on Bayless or Marshall. Cap hit is over 6 Mil a year and you give up a future 1st. I don't think this trade could have been any worse.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Ganzer, "IWB" View Post
    Shocked that Dekker is still on board, as bad as Bucks need a center & SG, do they take him if he's there?
    It sounded like Dekker's dad and the Bucks didn't feel like Milwaukee would be a good fit for Sam.
    March Madness starts in November

  5. #5
    Yuck, yuck, yuck... Vasquez is just another guy, no need to trade for him when you could easily get a guy like that with more potential with that same draft pick you traded.
    The artist formerly known as "the sitting MU coach for president"

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by MKE_GoldenEagleFan View Post
    Yuck, yuck, yuck... Vasquez is just another guy, no need to trade for him when you could easily get a guy like that with more potential with that same draft pick you traded.
    I take it you don't watch much NBA basketball. Getting arguably the best backup PG in the league and a guy that can fill in and give you starter quality numbers isn't something that is "easily" done in the back third of the first round in an NBA draft. My goodness.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by MKE_GoldenEagleFan View Post
    Yuck, yuck, yuck... Vasquez is just another guy, no need to trade for him when you could easily get a guy like that with more potential with that same draft pick you traded.
    I agree - seems like a lot to give up. Solid enough guy, but not a huge difference maker IMO.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by AbovetheRim View Post
    I take it you don't watch much NBA basketball. Getting arguably the best backup PG in the league and a guy that can fill in and give you starter quality numbers isn't something that is "easily" done in the back third of the first round in an NBA draft. My goodness.
    I watch a ton of NBA ball - more than college - just don't see him as a break through performer for what they gave up.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by MKE_GoldenEagleFan View Post
    Yuck, yuck, yuck... Vasquez is just another guy, no need to trade for him when you could easily get a guy like that with more potential with that same draft pick you traded.
    You don't watch the NBA. Off the bench, a good trade.

  10. #10
    Instead of just looking at this trade on the merits of is this guy worth a late first rounder next year or not, I am looking at this as the Bucks are really looking to make a move next year.

    I think the Bucks are confident that they are going to add a FA piece to the puzzle (center), and if they can do so think they can really make a run in the NBA East.
    They like how Parker is coming along, and just added a young guy that can shoot. They have starter positions set, and want to make sure they have depth at each spot (must have saw enough of Ennis to decided they needed a backup point for next year).

    The Bucks core is really young, and I'm sure they looked at this and thought here is a point that fits our model (a 6'6" point) and is still young but has some experience, including playoff experience.

    Now I think the Bucks must feel they do at every position for next season (if they can add a FA center).

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •