If Thomas was still at Duke the NCAA could have forced him to talk but they have no power over him now
Mark - that is exactly the point. In the case of the Miami booster they were dealing with former players. The NCAA stated, and I quote, "Refusal to speak to investigators will be treated as an admission of guilt."
So why is that the case with Miami and not Duke?
"When March Madness spills into April.... that's the gravy!" - Homer Simpson
Mark - that is exactly the point. In the case of the Miami booster they were dealing with former players. The NCAA stated, and I quote, "Refusal to speak to investigators will be treated as an admission of guilt."
So why is that the case with Miami and not Duke?
Because one is Miami and one is Duke. Next question.
90% of quotes on the internet are wrong.
- Abraham Lincoln
Yeah I guess I don't know why they would have treated the 2 cases differently. One of the national guys should ask the NCAA that question....
Originally Posted by Jim Ganzer, "IWB"
Mark - that is exactly the point. In the case of the Miami booster they were dealing with former players. The NCAA stated, and I quote, "Refusal to speak to investigators will be treated as an admission of guilt."