I'm slightly drunk after a night drinking my sorrows away with fellow MU fans on the beach (I'm partially rubbing that in to you all back in Milwaukee ), but I just got back and read Hunt's column from the game. This comment just had me pull my hair out (referencing Clarke):
"The guy is an above-average college shooter"
Anybody who follows college basketball knows Clarke is one of the best shooters in college hoops (which is indisputable). And Hunt says he's only "above-average"? No idea why something so minor pisses me off so royally, but just wondered if anybody else read the article and thought the same thing?