A loss is a loss, right?
If we're going to judge one man so harshly on razor-thin defeats, we must judge the next man by the same standards.
RPI top 100 and top three in the conference at season's end. Isn't that what was demanded?
A loss is a loss, right?
If we're going to judge one man so harshly on razor-thin defeats, we must judge the next man by the same standards.
RPI top 100 and top three in the conference at season's end. Isn't that what was demanded?