PDA

View Full Version : Coaches poll



Markedman
11-30-2015, 12:15 PM
4 Big East teams now ranked
http://sportspolls.usatoday.com/ncaa/basketball-men/polls/coaches-poll/

MU/Panther
11-30-2015, 12:44 PM
Butler has a big game on Wednesday at UC.

mufan2003
11-30-2015, 01:34 PM
Yes, and Georgetown hosts Syracuse on Saturday. Syracuse had nice wins over UCONN and Texas A&M to win the Battle 4 Atlantis. In the poll, I find it interesting that Arizona is ranked ahead of undefeated teams like Syracuse and Xavier. Even Providence that defeated Arizona in the Wooden Legacy tournament. Xavier is #14 in the AP poll. Vitale said he thought Xavier is clearly a Top 15 team after seeing them in Orlando. Shows some of the inherent flaws in the coaches' poll.

ge1974
11-30-2015, 01:48 PM
Villanova ranked #1 in Sagarin. MU is #108.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaab/sagarin/

I think people are getting too hung up on the MU boards regarding our RPI. Too early to know how good some teams will be. How many good wins will we have and how many bad losses at the end of the season is the question for a team from the Big East. As of now, I'd say we have two good wins and one bad loss...with lots of opportunities left for both to occur.

Markedman
11-30-2015, 04:48 PM
Good wins are typically top 50 RPI teams right? Not sure either of our 2 wins in Brooklyn will end up being top 50........bad losses are teams below 150 RPI I think(might be 100)... Belmont might fall into that category.

MU will have plenty of opportunities for quality wins in conference......will they be good enough to pull out enough of them?

I have my doubts but looking forward to finding out. Just hope they continue to compete and give themselves a chance in most conference games.

MKE_GoldenEagleFan
11-30-2015, 05:20 PM
Good wins are typically top 50 RPI teams right? Not sure either of our 2 wins in Brooklyn will end up being top 50........bad losses are teams below 150 RPI I think(might be 100)... Belmont might fall into that category.

MU will have plenty of opportunities for quality wins in conference......will they be good enough to pull out enough of them?

I have my doubts but looking forward to finding out. Just hope they continue to compete and give themselves a chance in most conference games.

Good wins are top 50, we won't have any in non conference in my opinion... Even if we beat UW... Bad losses are losses to teams sub 150, and I don't think we will have any of those (pending no slips the rest of the way.)

ge1974
11-30-2015, 07:22 PM
Again, you guys are putting too much emphasis on the RPI rating; especially at this point in time of the season. Yes, the RPI is important but not as much as it used to be when selecting teams. MU beat two power 5 conference teams on a neutral court. These defeated teams are expected to be in the middle of the standings for their conferences. Also, I don't look at the Belmont loss as necessarily being bad but rather consider the loss to Iowa by almost 30 points to be a real stinker. Even if we lose at Wisconsin and beat all the other bunnies on our schedule we will be 11-3 non-conference and if we go 10-8 in conference play in the tougher Big East this year, we will be selected for the NCAA, regardless of RPI, with 21 wins. Going 10-8 will be VERY tough but doable. We will have had to beaten some good teams for good wins

MKE_GoldenEagleFan
11-30-2015, 07:38 PM
Again, you guys are putting too much emphasis on the RPI rating; especially at this point in time of the season. Yes, the RPI is important but not as much as it used to be when selecting teams. MU beat two power 5 conference teams on a neutral court. These defeated teams are expected to be in the middle of the standings for their conferences. Also, I don't look at the Belmont loss as necessarily being bad but rather consider the loss to Iowa by almost 30 points to be a real stinker. Even if we lose at Wisconsin and beat all the other bunnies on our schedule we will be 11-3 non-conference and if we go 10-8 in conference play in the tougher Big East this year, we will be selected for the NCAA, regardless of RPI, with 21 wins. Going 10-8 will be VERY tough but doable. We will have had to beaten some good teams for good wins

I think you are putting too much value in the beating HM teams part, LSU and Arizona State could very likely not go down as quality wins.

ge1974
11-30-2015, 07:39 PM
I think you are putting too much value in the beating HM teams part, LSU and Arizona State could very likely not go down as quality wins.

Perhaps not Top 50 but good wins on a neutral court. The committee will like that, IMO.

MKE_GoldenEagleFan
11-30-2015, 09:25 PM
Perhaps not Top 50 but good wins on a neutral court. The committee will like that, IMO.

LSU lost at home to Charleston tonight, they are in for a rough year.

MUwarrior1090
12-01-2015, 10:49 AM
LSU lost at home to Charleston tonight, they are in for a rough year.

They'll turn it around. Young players will grow and they add two guys mid year.

Alan Bykowski, "brewcity77"
12-02-2015, 12:03 AM
Again, you guys are putting too much emphasis on the RPI rating; especially at this point in time of the season. Yes, the RPI is important but not as much as it used to be when selecting teams. MU beat two power 5 conference teams on a neutral court. These defeated teams are expected to be in the middle of the standings for their conferences. Also, I don't look at the Belmont loss as necessarily being bad but rather consider the loss to Iowa by almost 30 points to be a real stinker. Even if we lose at Wisconsin and beat all the other bunnies on our schedule we will be 11-3 non-conference and if we go 10-8 in conference play in the tougher Big East this year, we will be selected for the NCAA, regardless of RPI, with 21 wins. Going 10-8 will be VERY tough but doable. We will have had to beaten some good teams for good wins

I'd be shocked if we got in at 10-8. Is there too much RPI focus? Maybe, but consider the other factors we've heard the committee talk about. Did we choose a tough non-con schedule and just slip up? Did we minimize weak opponents? The answers to those questions aren't in our favor. Granted, improving as the season goes on could help, but we finish with Nova, GT, and @ Butler. It will be tough entering Selection Sunday with a winning streak. And even with Big East play, we'll have a SOS around 100.

If we're going to hang our hat on our conference resume, it needs to be really good. Because so far, Villanova, Xavier, and Providence have been unquestionably better in non-conference while Butler, Creighton, and Seton Hall are about on par with us. So to get in, we likely need a better (not equal) conference record than at least 3 of those teams, and that's without factoring in Georgetown, who's expected to compete for a berth.

We play 7 teams currently at 250 or lower in Pomeroy. Creighton is the only other Big East team that plays 5, and 7/10 teams play 3 or fewer. What that means for us is that we will need to be notably better in conference than those teams because they will almost certainly have a better non-con resume.

Because of our schedule, anyone we are tied or even one win better than will have a better resume than we do. We will need 2-3 more wins to get in ahead of conference teams. How many teams in this league will we be 2-3 games better than? If the Big East manages 6, the answer needs to be 4 for us to Dance. Any less and that task gets tougher. And the NCAA takes lower ranked teams in the same league rather frequently:

2014: Georgia (12-6 SEC) snubbed while Tennessee (11-7 SEC) is an 11-seed. West Virginia (9-9 B12) snubbed while Oklahoma State (8-10 B12) is a 9-seed.

2013: Alabama & Kentucky (both 12-6 SEC) snubbed while Mizzou (11-7 SEC) is a 9-seed. Iowa (9-9 B10) snubbed while Illinois & Minnesota (both 8-10 B10) get in as 7 & 11-seeds respectively.

The question isn't just if we'll win enough to overcome our non-conference, but if we'll be 2+ wins ahead of at least 4 other Big East teams since we'll likely have the worst non-con of any of the tournament hopefuls. At 10-8 that seems unlikely. We need 12-6 or better to really be comfortably ahead enough to know we're a lock. Teams like Villanova, Xavier, Providence, Seton Hall, and Butler will have better non-con resumes than us. Will we finish 2 games ahead of those teams in league play? Will we also finish ahead of Georgetown and Creighton? That's what it will take to get in. Not beating all of them, but quite a few.