PDA

View Full Version : Anybody Want To Bet



Phantom Warrior
05-20-2014, 07:13 PM
Either Lakers or Celtics (or both) move up into the top three?

WindyCityGoldenEagle
05-20-2014, 07:20 PM
Never mind that, how about the babe who is the bucks owners daughter? Yowzer!

warriorfan4life
05-20-2014, 07:42 PM
Never mind that, how about the babe who is the bucks owners daughter? Yowzer!

She's 18, so we do not have to feel too guilty about our admiration.

MU/Panther
05-20-2014, 07:51 PM
She is hot! Then after the commercial break they stand the top 3 up, and then you learn she has great legs.

Markedman
05-20-2014, 09:31 PM
Either Lakers or Celtics (or both) move up into the top three?

The conspiracy theories have been disproved so many times It isn't even worth talking about anymore.........Every team has a representative in the room when the ping pong balls come out of the tube.....the NBA is made up of 30 owners all with their own interests to protect.......


Cleveland has now won 3 of the last 4 lotteries......CLEVELAND!

If they are trying to help the big markets somebody should tell them they are doing it all wrong.......

TheSultan
05-21-2014, 08:06 AM
NBA conspiracy theorists boggle the mind. Why would arguably the most successful franchise over the last 15 years be in San Antonio while the Knicks keep floundering?

pbiflyer
05-21-2014, 09:16 AM
Picture of the Bucks owner's daughter?

MUMac
05-21-2014, 11:47 AM
751
Picture of the Bucks owner's daughter?

pbiflyer
05-21-2014, 12:05 PM
Thanks Mac

Alan Bykowski, "brewcity77"
05-21-2014, 01:23 PM
NBA conspiracy theorists boggle the mind. Why would arguably the most successful franchise over the last 15 years be in San Antonio while the Knicks keep floundering?

To be fair, anyone that watched Game 6 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals knows the NBA isn't above rigging something to get the outcome they want. I don't think the lottery is rigged anymore, but I don't think it's inconceivable that they may have rigged lotteries years ago when there wasn't as much oversight as there is today.

Goose85
05-21-2014, 02:25 PM
To be fair, anyone that watched Game 6 of the 2002 Western Conference Finals knows the NBA isn't above rigging something to get the outcome they want. I don't think the lottery is rigged anymore, but I don't think it's inconceivable that they may have rigged lotteries years ago when there wasn't as much oversight as there is today.

There was too much crap surrounding the Ewing to Knicks lottery. After that one everyone was watching close.
Too much money at stake for owners to allow any ping pong ball fixing.

Who goes #1?

Like the #2 pick for Bucks. A lot of value.

Embiid goes #1.
If someone really loves Wiggins or Parker (like Philly) the Bucks could move back a spot and pick up something of value.

If Embiid is #1, who should the Bucks pick at #2?

Cooby Snacks
05-21-2014, 06:01 PM
T
If Embiid is #1, who should the Bucks pick at #2?

Regardless of whether Embiid is available at #2, I want the Bucks to take Wiggins or Parker.

Goose85
05-22-2014, 12:00 AM
Regardless of whether Embiid is available at #2, I want the Bucks to take Wiggins or Parker.

Agreed. And if Philly at 3 really wants Wiggins, I'd be happy to move from 2 to 3 for the right price and still land Parker.

Alan Bykowski, "brewcity77"
05-23-2014, 01:31 PM
Frankly, I don't think it'd be that bad to move back to the 4-pick. Take Exum to play the point, then hope to land Hood, Harris, or maybe Anderson at the 12? Philly has the 3 and 10, Orlando has the 4 and 12. Dropping back might not be a bad idea at all when you consider how good the top-4 looks.

TheSultan
05-23-2014, 01:40 PM
Frankly, I don't think it'd be that bad to move back to the 4-pick. Take Exum to play the point, then hope to land Hood, Harris, or maybe Anderson at the 12? Philly has the 3 and 10, Orlando has the 4 and 12. Dropping back might not be a bad idea at all when you consider how good the top-4 looks.


Which is precisely why Orlando is likely not going to give up #12 to move up two spots.